The Paradox of Aftercare: Increased Self-Harm Repetition but Reduced Suicide Risk
In this seriesClinical Pearl5
Why Was This Research Needed?
How does aftercare following self-harm hospital presentations impact the rates of self-harm repetition and suicide?
Bottom Line
Aftercare services following self-harm episodes are associated with an increased risk of repeat self-harm presentations but a significant decrease in suicide risk, suggesting improved help-seeking behavior.
Study at a Glance
- Study Design
- Cohort study
- Population
- Patients aged 10+ years who presented to hospitals with self-harm episodes from 2012-2016 in Taiwan
- Intervention
- Aftercare provided through Taiwan's National Suicide Surveillance System including follow-up calls and assessments
- Comparator
- Patients with no aftercare
- Primary Outcome
- Rates of self-harm repetition and suicide within one year of index episode
Key Findings
- Aftercare is associated with a 17% increase in the risk of self-harm repetition (aHR=1.17) but a 20% reduction in suicide risk (aHR=0.80).
- Young patients aged 10-24 showed the most significant decrease in suicide risk (aHR=0.64), whereas middle-aged patients (45-64) had a higher increase in self-harm repetition risk (aHR=1.34).
- Patients without a history of psychiatric disorders displayed an increased reduction in suicide risk with aftercare compared to those with such history (aHR=0.76).
- The program appears to enhance help-seeking behaviors post-self-harm, indicated by higher repeat hospital presentations.
Implications for Practice
Clinicians should view repeat self-harm presentations after intervention as opportunities for further engagement and support, rather than treatment failures. Emphasis on follow-up and psychological support is critical for reducing long-term suicide risk.
Caveats & Limitations
The study's observational nature limits causality conclusions, and the increased self-harm risk may reflect greater engagement in mental health services.
This summary was AI-assisted and reviewed by an editor. It does not constitute medical advice. Always consult the original publication and your clinical judgment.